Dr. Judith Reisman - About Dr. Reisman - Exposing the Kinsey Institute and Alfred Kinsey's use of child sexual abuse and fraudulent sex science to defame The Greatest Generation.

Photo Credit: Sherrie Buzby.

About Dr. Reisman

Speaking to concerned parents, professionals and citizens. Counseling parliaments, legislatures and courts worldwide.

Summary
A Personal Odyssey to the Truth
Worldwide Courts and Legislatures Presence
Comments on Dr. Reisman and her Work
Brief Vitae of Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D.
Contact and Donations

Summary

Dr. Judith Reisman is sought worldwide to speak, lecture, testify, and counsel individuals, organizations, professionals and governments regarding a) fraudulent sex science, sex education and b) the power and effect of images and the monopoly media to alter human brain, mind, memory and conduct. The special emphasis of her work has been and continues to be the negative influence of these change agents upon children and society.

Dr. Reisman is president of The Institute for Media Education, author of the U.S. Department of Justice, Juvenile Justice study, Images of Children, Crime and Violence in Playboy, Penthouse and Hustler (1989), Kinsey, Sex and Fraud (Reisman, et al., 1990) and Soft Porn Plays Hardball (1991), Partner Solicitation Language as a Reflection of Male Sexual Orientation (w/Johnson, 1995), and Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences (1998, 2000) and is a news commentator for WorldNetDaily.com. She has been a consultant to four U.S. Department of Justice administrations, The U.S. Department of Education, as well as the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Dr. Reisman is listed in numerous Who's Who biographies such as: Who's Who in Science & Engineering, International Who's Who in Sexology, International Who's Who in Education, Who's Who of American Women and The World's Who's Who of Women. Her scholarly findings have had international legislative and scientific import in the United States, Israel, South Africa, Canada and Australia, while The German Medical Tribune and the British medical journal, The Lancet demanded that the Kinsey Institute be investigated, saying:

The Kinsey reports (one in 1948 on males and the companion five years later) claimed that sexual activity began much earlier in life.... and displayed less horror of age differences and same-sex relationships than anyone at the time imagined. It was as if, to follow Mr. Porter again, "Anything goes". In Kinsey, Sex and Fraud, Dr. Judith A. Reisman and her colleagues demolish the foundations of the two reports ... Kinsey et al ... questioned an unrepresentative proportion of prison inmates and sex offenders in a survey of "normal" sexual behavior. Presumably some at least of those offenders were also the sources of information on stimulation to orgasm in young children that can only have come from pedophiles--or so it must be hoped. Kinsey.... has left his former co-workers some explaining to do. The Lancet, (Vol. 337: March 2, 1991, p. 547).

Tim Tate, UNESCO and Amnesty International Award-winning Producer-Director of "Kinsey's Paedophiles," Yorkshire Television, Great Britain, 1998: "In the course of producing my documentary-Kinsey's Paedophiles—it became clear that every substantive allegation Reisman made was not only true but thoroughly sourced with documentary evidence—despite the Kinsey Institute's reluctance to open its files."

A Personal Odyssey to the Truth

By Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D.

I have been asked to introduce myself so that you know something of my life and how I came to discover Kinsey's child molestation protocol, his false data, his molding of modern sex education and of western sexual culture and conduct, as well as how I came be involved in international governmental hearings on science fraud, child sexual abuse, pornography, drugs and the other critical issues of our time. I will try to touch on the points in my life which may be of most use to readers of this Kinsey expose.

I was born, Judith Ann Gelernter, in 1935 in Newark, New Jersey. Mine was a large and thriving second-generation Jewish-American family, Russian on my maternal side, German on my parental side. Both sets of grandparents had fled persecution in Europe, and upon landing at Ellis Island in New York, they thankfully embraced their adopted country, immediately took up menial labor, and raised large families of achievers.

My father Matthew was born in Massachusetts and my mother Ada in New Jersey. They eventually owned "Matthew's Sea Food," a prosperous fish business, in Irvington, New Jersey. The Gelernter's held family meetings every few months at Aunt Laura's large home in South Orange, New Jersey. More than forty adults and dozens of children sat down to dinners tastefully arranged and served, table manners always impeccable. After dinner, without the modern invention of television, political debates raged between my parents and the family, but all was mended when cousin Ruth sat down at the piano to accompany my father and three aunts, Laura, Shirley and Mary, as they sang old Yiddish and American folk songs in four-part harmony. I was mesmerized.

For me, they were musical giants, singing, swaying, smiling and beckoning. My dad, looked, I thought, movie-star handsome alongside my favorite Aunt Mary, a beautiful red-haired, green-eyed soprano. She had rejected an offer from the Metropolitan Opera in order to marry and raise a family.

Dad would often remind me that "Gelernter" means "the learned one" in German, a name of distinction bequeathed to my ancestors to record who they were and what they did in life. "Your life should be an honor to your name," he would say. My mother, Ada, was of more common "Goldberg" stock. Charming and refined, Mother played the lead in major little theater productions at the YMHA, the Young Men's Hebrew Association, directed by Moss Hart, Dore Shary, and other local boys who went on to become major 1930s Hollywood film moguls. While the artistic talent I inherited from my father and mother afforded me a rewarding profession as an adult, I also inherited from them their love of truth, concern for the powerless, and resistance to tyranny, all of which launched me upon the difficult journey described in this book.

I lived at a wonderful time. My mother welcomed me home every day and my father supported anything I did. I felt safe with neighbors, uncles or cousins as was the custom of that time. I married, and the hedge of protection about my life was not breached until 1966 when my 10-year-old daughter was molested by a 13-year-old adored and trusted family friend. She told him to stop, but he persisted. He knew she would like it, he said, he knew from his father's magazines, the only "acceptable" pornography of the time. The boy left the country a few weeks later, after it came to light that my daughter was but one of several neighborhood children he had raped, including his own little brother. My heart was broken for all the families involved.

This appalling event in our lives, I would learn later, was a pattern with juvenile sex offenders, as they are known in law enforcement circles.

I might never have known anything about her violation, except that my daughter slipped into a deep depression. Only after I promised not to call the police would she talk about what happened. After assuring her this was not her fault, I called my dependable, staid aunt who listened sympathetically and declared, "Well Judy, she may have been looking for this herself. Children are sexual from birth." Stunned, I replied that my child was not seeking sex, and called my Berkeley school chum, Carole, who counseled, "Well Judy, she may have been looking for this herself. You know children are sexual from birth." I wondered at this same locution from two such different people so separated geographically. I did not know it then, but as a young mother, I had entered the world according to Kinsey. I would hear that "children are sexual from birth" again, but the next time, I would learn the hidden circumstances surrounding its source.

In 1973 I sat in the darkened CBSTV film library pointing out the exact Encyclopedia Britannic clip of "Market Day in Old England" I would use for my next children's music video. With my dad's voice and mother's presence, I was still continually astonished that people paid me to write and sing songs for children! I was a producer of music-videos for "Captain Kangaroo," the most beloved, trusted, long-running children's television program in the United States. Jim Hirschfeld, "Captain's" producer had immediately put me to work after seeing a sampler of my music-video productions from "Children's Fair," an ETV (PBSTV) program in Wisconsin, "Merry-Go-Round," a CBSTV subsidiary in Ohio, and "Art Through Music" for Scholastics Magazine in New York. On my way to "Captain" I had produced educational materials for several museums: the Milwaukee Public Museum, the Cleveland Museum of Art and the Skirball Museum in Los Angeles. I was very concerned in those days about the way images impacted on the brain, mind and memory.

Jim was a kind, courteous man and a committed father, so he made wide allowances for me to work from my home in Cleveland. I recorded at a local sound studio, had the songs illustrated, and sent the final product to New York. With no agent, relying only on my God-given talent, I was at the top of my field. I was deeply impressed that the American system of rewards-for-merit made that possible. Then, Jim called me into his office one day and reluctantly showed me a computer printout. A test group of children was studied, using a hidden camera to track their eye movements. Jim reassured me that while he loved my thoughtful tunes, the advertiser wanted children's eyes locked onto the screen, without mom controlling the knob, children now watched television alone, tuning out "Captain," and tuning into cartoons. I would have to speed up my tempo to compete with the fast-action and the increasing violence of the cartoons on other stations. Bob Keeshan (Captain) was distressed by this and so was Jim, but we had no choice, he said.

I found myself unwilling or unable to write for children that way. However, all was not lost. With the excellent royalties from Captain, I was able to return to college for an advanced degree, studying mass media effects. Having spent the last fifteen years at a university as a professor's wife, I was both keenly aware of the regard the world had for those with advanced degrees and often dis-appointed in what I privately considered a lack of intellectual curiosity and vigor within the educated community. I found faculty parties and conversations somehow lacking in a basic sort of common sense, and for all their degrees, most academicians seemed to welcome being out of touch with the reality of the majority.

My museum art work and my television experience left me worried about the way children were being influenced, reconfigured, actually changed, as images and other exciting stimuli daily altered the very structure of the receiving child's brain. If a prestigious and responsible program like "Captain," had to speed-up its format in the days of "Leave it to Beaver," what would happen in the decades to come? What kind of children was television fashioning and how would these altered children change our institutions of education, theology, government, law, medicine, family--mass media itself?

Determined to earn a doctorate in communications, I entered Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland to study television effects and found, much to my surprise as a concerned media professional that by 1972 television toxicity had been well documented by the Surgeon General's report on television violence.

By ignoring the hard findings, by the "gatekeepers" not reporting the facts, the mass media successfully discounted and concealed the dangers of its own profession. That there was an already existing but ignored body of research on television effects caused the focus of my graduate work to shift, especially after I witnessed what could be called a worrisome unmonitored experiment in verbal versus non-verbal behavior.

In one of my classes, a young communications student, whose fiance had just left him, had scripted a video production using graphic pictures from Playboy, Penthouse, Hustler, and similar magazines. Dr. Lowell Lynn, the course professor, assured me all the students working on the production gave prior consent to its content. They had "no problem" with the pictures, he said, and after the initial nervous giggling subsided, the ordinarily collegial student team toiled in utter silence. Oddly enough then, while none of the sex photos got onto the videotape correctly, all female students working on the project, from director to camera crew, verbally denied that the pictures disturbed them in any way This was an amazing study in the splitting of natural and real emotion from reality since the coeds were obviously upset by the theme and content of the production.

That is, they were so discomforted that none would watch the pictures they agreed to film. Yet, each denied her reaction and blamed the others for "not looking" at the sex pictures. I walked away thinking, if women and girls are exposed to these images worldwide, significant numbers of women and girls worldwide must also be denying very real emotions and aversions.

These images could wreck havoc in the delicate relations between husband and wife, I thought. Since I had daughters I wanted to see happily married to well adjusted men, I decided I had best look into this. It was 1976. Still having no notion of the role of Alfred Kinsey in pornography, nor exactly how "hard" and "soft" pornography related to child sex abuse, I had no idea how bad I would find this problem to be, or how deeply I would become involved in the attempt to solve it. However, I could already see the evidence of how the cultural acceptance of pornography's view of sex was increasing rates of divorce and sexual disorder.

By 1977 I was in Wales to deliver a research paper on women and pornography at the British Psychological Association International Conference on "Love and Attraction" at Swansea University. When I arrived in London I heard that Tom O'Carroll, the leader of the "Pedophile Information Exchange" (PIE), had been blanketing England on a public relations tour, promoting sex with children on his way to speak at the Swansea conference. All of England was in a uproar over the daily press reports describing the aims of PIE and O'Carroll. It was reported that PIE specialized in providing specific lists of places where pedophiles could locate and seduce children. The Swansea University housekeeping staff went on strike when they heard he was to speak from their college podium. They said beds would not be made, nor food cooked, nor clothes washed if the conference gave place to a man promoting sex with children.

I brought eighty slides for my presentation as evidence supporting my findings of child pornography in Playboy and Penthouse. I had already clashed with an American professor, Larry Constantine, a Penthouse board member advocating child pornography in his paper on "The Sexual Rights of Children." So, when Constantine sent out a harried bulletin for a meeting of conference speakers, I hastened to join the group. All international attendees were asked to sign a petition demanding that PIE's O'Carroll speak and that our beds be made. I urged the group to reconsider. We were leaving in a few days, I reasoned. Had we the right to leave behind us a community undone by our having given place to a proselytizing child molester? In the end, I was the only one who would not sign his petition. Ultimately, the Swansea University president ruled O'Carroll was not credentialed to speak, and housekeeping service resumed.

How? why? I wondered, was the university's domestic staff able to aggressively protect their children, while trained academicians remained apathetic, even sympathetic toward this pedophile, O'Carroll? My old disappointments with the university community continued as I noted these credentialed men and women conduct themselves with such indifference to the local people, disdaining what I saw as very legitimate concerns for the protection of their own children.

With O'Carroll safely out of Wales, I was leaving for the London train when a Canadian psychologist took me quietly aside. Certainly, I was right, he said. Those images of children in Playboy/Penthouse would cause sexual acting out on children. But if I was looking for the cause of the global child sex abuse epidemic, he directed me not to neglect reading about Kinsey in The Sex Researchers, by Edward Brecher. "Why?" I asked. "I worked with Kinsey and Pomeroy" he said. "One was a pedophile and the other a homosexual." Which is which, I asked? "Read and discover," he replied.

As I flew back to the States, I pondered the events of the last few weeks. Certainly, I now knew, because I had witnessed it, that there was a growing and proselytizing "international academic pedophile movement" which was on record as wanting access to children for sex. I had stumbled right into their midst at the conference . Again, I wondered what kind of academic training was producing the coarsened and predatory intelligentsia I had met?

Taking up the Canadian on his tip, as soon as I got home I did read Edward Brecher's book, The Sex Researchers. I was unsure which stunned me more at the time, Kinsey's use of infants in sex experiments, or Brecher's acceptance of their use as a research methodology. Speechless, I went back to Kinsey's original book to check Brecher. Yes, he was quoting Kinsey accurately. Now I finally knew there was a source authority for children increasingly being viewed sexually; for me, personally, the question from years before was answered. My aunt and my friend Carole had both gotten the idea that "children were sexual from birth" from Kinsey.

By 1981 I sat in my mountain-top office at Haifa University in Israel staring at the tables of numbers which were staring right back up at me from Kinsey's world famous book, Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. As I had done so many times before, I was studying page 180, Table 34, straining to see if there was something I missed, something I may have misunderstood. I had checked all the Kinsey citations and references in the library, but nowhere was there any mention of child abuse data. I searched all of the books on Kinsey, read the biographies, the hundreds of positive articles about him and his work, and the few scathing reviews, but nowhere was there any criticism of these tables and graphs. I was beginning to accept the fact that the thousands of international scientists who studied Kinsey never saw what was right before their eyes.

In March 1981 I received a reply to my letter to Kinsey's co-author, Dr. Paul Gebhard. I had written to ask about the child data in Tables 30-34. Gebhard, who succeeded Dr. Kinsey as the Kinsey Institute Director, wrote to me that the children in Kinsey's tables were obtained from parents, school teachers and homosexuals who liked young boys and that some of the men used "manual and oral techniques" to catalog how many "orgasms" infants and children could produce in a given amount of time.

Armed with Gebhard's letter and admissions, on June 23, 1981, I created an uproar in Jerusalem at the 5th World Congress of Sexology when I lectured on Dr. Kinsey and his child data. I was confident my sexology colleagues would be as outraged as was I by these tables and the child data describing Kinsey's reliance on pedophiles as his child sex experimenters. Perhaps worst of all for me, as a scholar and a mother, were on pages 160 and 161, Kinsey claimed his data came from "interviews." How could he say 196 little children-- some as young as 2-months of age--enjoyed "fainting," "screaming," "weeping," and "convulsing"--how could he call these children's responses evidence of their sexual pleasure and "climax"? I called it evidence of terror, of pain, as well as criminal. One of us was very, very mixed-up.

I was positive that the international, educated sexuality community would react as I did. Certainly this revelation about Kinsey, his team, and all of these infant and child data would electrify a conference of global Ph.D.s, and many would agree to my call for an investigation of Kinsey. The human sexuality brain trust worldwide was in attendance at the Jerusalem conference; from Great Britain, the United States, France, Denmark, Israel, Norway, Canada, Scotland, Holland, Sweden and scores of other nations. All attendees knew of my paper. It had been the talk of the event, receiving even more notice than Xaviera Hollander's ("The Happy Hooker") address on "Out of Touch With Sex." People were abuzz about the issue of Kinsey's children during the entire conference.

My title, "The Scientist as A Contributing Agent To Child Sexual Abuse; A Preliminary Consideration of Possible Ethics Violations," had been released in the Abstracts. The result was no less than I expected--a standing-room only session. I was gratified that so many people were as concerned as I was. After screening my slides of Kinsey's Tables 30 to 34 which described Kinsey's report of rates and speeds of "orgasms" of at least 317 infants and children (again, the youngest a mere two-months old) and presenting Gebhard's letter of confirmation, I rested my case and looked out over the audience. The room was totally silent. Finally, a tall, blond, Nordic type who had been standing near the podium broke out and fairly shouted at the audience:

"I am a Swedish reporter and I never have spoken out at a conference. That is not my role. But, what is the matter with all of you? This woman has just dropped an atomic bomb in this very room and you have nothing to ask? Nothing to say?"

That broke the ice and hands shot up to speak. Comments from those in attendance were limited by the conference moderator, but an investigation would take place. The reaction in the room was heavy; it was numbing for some, discomforting for others. Later, the director of sex education for Sweden approached to tell me she was shocked that children were used without consent. However, she hastened to assure me that children could be sexually stimulated by adults even parents, were this for strictly therapeutic reasons, of course. Late that afternoon my young assistant from Haifa University arrived back from lunch visibly shaken. She had dined at a private table with the international executives of the conference.

My paper was hotly contested and largely condemned, since everyone at her table of about twelve men and women wholeheartedly agreed that children could, indeed, have "loving" sex with adults. I realized clearly that the entire field of sex research relied on Kinsey's human sexuality model for authority and I was there to tell his disciples Kinsey was a fraud. While I was very disappointed in the reaction, with so many international agencies present with vested economic and emotional interests in Kinsey's credibility, I understood why the conference did not choose to investigate Kinsey.

Months later, my daughter died suddenly of a brain aneurysm. Never knowing if her childhood rape had contributed to her death, I would spend decades working to protect other children from the growing multitude of Kinsey-Hefner disciples. In 1982, shortly after the confrontation in Jerusalem over Kinsey's Table 34, I was invited by the U.S. Department of Justice, Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, to return to America from Israel. I was appointed as a Full Research Professor at American University as the principal investigator of an $800,000 grant to investigate Kinsey's role in child sexual abuse and the link to children appearing in mainstream pornography, Playboy, Penthouse and Hustler.

The commercial sex industry now joined forces with the Kinsey Institute and academic sexology to prevent any light from being shed on their world. In time I would obtain copies of secret letters and packages, clandestinely sent worldwide by the Kinsey Institute and pornographers, to discredit my investigation into Kinsey and that of children appearing in their magazines. The Kinsey Institute had secretly threatened American University with a lawsuit if I was allowed to carry out my study.

Therefore, concealing why they were being such obstructionists, the University demanded that I study nothing relating to Kinsey. Of course, this was a complete violation of academic freedom as well as the public's right to know, indeed what the taxpayer was paying to know. All along, the Kinsey Institute maintained a constant, stealth effort, largely censoring me and my findings from the print and broadcast media, all relevant professional conferences and journals, book publishers and such.

In 1990 when some of my child abuse findings were printed in a small-circulation book, popular talk show host and Kinsey devotee, Phil Donahue, telecast Kinsey's general importance to the world. A boy in his audience asked why Kinsey should matter to him, today. Mr. Donahue instructed the youth, too young to remember:

Kinsey was to sexuality what Freud was to psychiatry, what Madame Curie was to radiation, what Einstein was to physics. Comes along this woman [Reisman] saying, "Holy cow! E doesn't equal MC squared. We've based an entire generation of education of sexologists on Kinsey, and Kinsey was a dirty old man."

While Donahue countered that day that Kinsey was really a fine family man, I suggest it is time to let people decide for themselves, who and what Kinsey was. Despite what Mr. Donahue says, this much is certain: the world has a right to know what has been hidden up to now, a right and a responsibility to know, what happened to the children of Table 34?

It is time to identify what effect Alfred Kinsey, the father of the sexual revolution and sex education has had on the lives of so many. Since 1948, public health report data confirm a "sea change" in the way America and the rest of the western world views human sexuality The results are hardly reassuring. As the shift in judgment has occurred over the last 50 years, it is certain, based on the statistical evidence, that our direction deserves review. As Mr. Donahue said, western culture has "based an entire generation of education of sexologists on Kinsey and Kinsey was a dirty old man."

What does that mean for us all? This book, I hope, will be an answer. As Congress readies itself to investigate Kinsey under HR 2749, The Child Protection and Ethics in Education Act, and as the Kinsey Institute readies itself for its 50-year retrospective of Kinsey's contributions to society, it is my greatest hope, as a scholar and as a mother, that the truth will finally be presented--and that the world will have the courage to look at the truth for the benefit of generations to come.

Worldwide Courts and Legislatures Presence

A Presence and an Influence in Worldwide Courts and Legislatures Professional Advisor: California Judicial Investigative Task Force

INTERNATIONALLY

SOUTH AFRICA, October 2003: The South African Constitutional Court relied upon Dr. Reisman's research on the impact of pornography on brain, mind, memory in its decision to halt legal leeway for the distribution of child pornography in South Africa.

SOUTH AFRICA, 1995: The Office of the Attorney General thanks Dr. Reisman for "your knowledge and your expertise.... your assistance in saving this nation from a potential disaster.... we have achieved a major victory on the pornography front.... which would not have been possible without the aid of your expert knowledge, books, videos and articles."Dr. Reisman's testimony on the ways graphic, antisocial imagery reconfigures brain, mind and memory helped pass The Film and Publications Bill of 1995, by an overwhelming majority of 300 votes, prohibiting child pornography in any form (written, visual, cartoon, "artistic" or pseudo), and prohibiting current types of "adult" pornography

AUSTRALIA, Parliament 1994 and 1992: Following her April 6, 1992 invited testimony and report on pornography and the harm factor to the Senate Select Committee on Community Standards, Parliament banned "X" Rated materials from pay cable TV, while her March 1994 research paper aided Parliament's decision, based on harm, to similarly ban "R" Rated materials from pay cable TV.

CANADA, Supreme Court 1992: Dr. Reisman provided briefing materials on pornography and harm, aiding the Canadian Supreme Court's unanimous decision February 27, 1992 to ban all pornography as "obscene" as it undermines equality by degrading, subjugating and dehumanizing women.Subsequently, in 1993, Dr. Reisman was tasked by the Ontario Human Rights Commission to produce a research paper, "Pornography in Neighborhood Convenience Stores: Neurochemical Effects on Women," for a pornography case challenging the new law--results pending

NEW ZEALAND, Tribunal 1991 and 1989: Dr. Reisman's research was delivered by-proxy via Dr. John Court to the New Zealand Pornography Commission investigations in 1989.She was again asked for, and delivered, written testimony to the New Zealand Indecency Tribunal in 1991

ISRAEL, Knesset 1982: Dr. Reisman founded a media monitoring, non-profit foundation in Israel, funded by private and public sources that have presented findings on Israeli media to the Knesset and throughout Israel.At minimum, major corrections and improvements were made in controlling advertisements, largely due to Dr. Reisman's data collection, cadre training, and public dissemination of information.

THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT

MASSACHUSETTS, 1989: Oakes v. Massachusetts. Massachusetts Attorney General, James Shannon cited Dr. Reisman's DoJ, Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention study in this successful brief and in oral appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. Shannon wrote (1/8/90):

I contacted Dr. Reisman in connection with an important child pornography case, Massachusetts v. Oakes…that I argued in the United States Supreme Court in January 1989…I had to convince the court that both nude and sexually explicit photographs of children were exploitive and harmful.To make the point, I quoted Dr. Reisman's study, "Images of Children, Crime and Violence in Playboy, Penthouse, and Hustler Magazines," in which she showed that sexually exploitive photographs of children condone and promote a distorted view of sexuality, often by pairing...sexuality and violence, or depicting children as desiring sexual activity with adults.

US Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation
The Science Behind Pornography Addiction - November 18, 2004Science, Technology, and Space HearingThursday, November 18 2004
Description: Testimony examining brain science related to pornography addiction and the effects of such addiction on families and communities.

OHIO, 1989: Osborne v. Ohio.Amici cited "Neurochemical Evidence Shows That People React Differently To Pictures Than They Do To Words Raising New First Amendment Considerations" and thanks "Dr. Judith Reisman for her valuable development of this concept" (:23) and, "J.Reisman's New York Review of Law and Social Change," (1979) where she addressed media, science and civil rights.

On behalf of the Amici in Osborne v. Ohio.... thanks for your invaluable assistance rendered to us in researching and writing this brief.Your ideas on how the visual images effect people substantially more than the written word is indeed a new concept and could have many significant ramifications in the area of the First Amendment.If in fact the court and legislatures do believe that visual images, specifically of sexual, sexually violent and violent material, will have a greater impact on people in general and children in particular, there may be justification for more strict legislation in these areas than would apply to the written material.Moreover, under a First Amendment analysis, since the harm is greater, there would be more of a compelling state interest to have stricter laws. (H. Robert Showers, 10/12/89).

USA LOWER COURTS

Crawford v. Lungren, 1996: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the right of California's news rack laws to protect minors in support of Amici arguments by the National Law Center for Children and Families.Amici cited to Reisman's Canadian paper,"Pornography in Neighborhood Convenience Stores: Neurochemical Effects on Women," that "Images reach the brain more quickly than print" (:15).

Steffan v. Perry, 1994 and 1991: The U.S. States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.The lower court in 1991, under Judge Oliver Gash, cited Reisman's book in rejecting Steffan's appeal.Upon challenge in 1994, Colonel Ronald Ray Esq., Ret., and Reisman filed an Amicus brief on behalf of the Naval Aviation Foundation in support of the Department of Defense ruling, that homosexuality and sexual conduct cannot be separated.General P.X. Kelley, former member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Commandant of The Marine Corps, wrote of Reisman's "groundbreaking work in Kinsey, Sex & Fraud," (October 5, 1994) in recommending she and Colonel Ray enter the Steffan case.

United States v. Knox, 1994: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third District, ruled in support of arguments presented in the Institute for Media Education Amicus and Arnold & Porter written with Colonel Ron Ray and Randall Shaheen, citing Reisman's research on images and for OJJDP, to protect children from use in child pornography.

TEXAS, 1993:Despite obstructions, the Court's successful use of Dr. Reisman's findings continues.A Texas prosecutor wrote the following:

As a prosecuting attorney, I have tried approximately 35 obscenity jury trials in which the defense has called a sociologist as an expert witness on community standards.Your book, Kinsey, Sex and Fraud, has proven invaluable on cross-examination.This sociologist studied at the Kinsey Institute and bases a lot of expert opinions on his studies at that institute.To be able to point out to the jury the fraud that Alfred Kinsey and his institute have perpetrated is a very effective tool…I encourage you to continue your work in this area to point out to the public the frauds sociology and psychology have given us (March 8, 1993).

OHIO, 1991:State of Ohio v. Contemporary Arts Center, (Mapplethorpe trial): The presiding judge rules in agreement with Dr. Reisman's expert testimony re: what was Mapplethorpe's artistic "whole" to be viewed by the jury.Frank Prouty, the State prosecutor writes: As you know, the State filed a Motion in Limine regarding what constituted the "whole" as that issue related to the Mapplethorpe exhibit.Your testimony was critical to the Motion, and your testimony ensured a favorable ruling for the State…The issues and interpretation you presented concerning the child photographs and the remaining photographs substantiated the prosecution's view…The perspective you established was both concise and persuasive, and should be considered in any interpretation of pornography and its affect in both children and adults (March 4, 1991).

CALIFORNIA, 1989: Ventura County Superior Court cites Reisman's research to convict child pornography Hustler cartoonist, Dwaine Tinsley. Mr. Hardy indicated that your report [Dr. Reisman's "Images of Children, Crime and Violence"] was extremely helpful throughout the prosecution of the Tinsley case.Mr. Hardy used the report as a reference source for putting together his closing arguments, and for his cross examination…Mr. Hardy considers your report to be a great piece of work, and has recommended the report…to the National Association of District Attorneys…your report…was a great help in the prosecution of this case (March 28, 1989).

Dr. Reisman has been successfully consulted on sexual harassment in the Minnesota workplace; on a mother's rights to child custody from an AIDS father in Kentucky; in testimony before the Attorney General's Commission on pornography; on homosexual versus parents rights in a Connecticut classroom on fraudulent sex education in Falmouth schools. She is currently consultant for a first amendment versus parental rights case involving one government school, in a second school versus parents' case involving subversion of parents to provide contraception to minors and a third case involving sexual harassment in the workplace.

LEGISLATION

WASHINGTON, D.C., December 1995: HR 2749, The Child Protection and Ethics in Education Act, is introduced.A Bill to determine if Alfred Kinsey's Sexual Behavior in the Human Male and/or Sexual Behavior in the Human Female are the result of any fraud or criminal wrongdoing: 41 co-sponsors; carried over to 1997-1998 legislature to investigate the Kinsey data.This Bill is the culmination of Dr. Reisman's 20-years of research and advocacy for children.A Senate hearing waits in the wings.

MINNESOTA, 1993: After a last-minute briefing and presentation of pedophile exhibits by Dr. Reisman to Minnesota legislators, "affectional orientation" language, which allows children to be in legal sexual relationships with adults, is removed from two pending Minnesota laws.

GEORGIA, 1992: Heeding Dr. Reisman's exhibits and expert testimony on February 13, 1992, the State of Georgia House Education Subcommittee terminates Georgia's then mandated sex education curriculum due to its false, Kinseyan database.The educator who organized the legislative event credits Reisman's data, additionally, with the overwhelming legislative defeat of the homosexual/sex education lobby, by a house vote of 150-1 and a Senate vote of 48-6.The legislature prohibits teaching youths illegal behavior such as sodomy, adultery, and fornication.(C. Weatherly, Education Analysis & Research Systems, June 11, 1992).

WASHINGTON, D.C., 1991: Congressman William E. Danneymeyer cites Dr. Reisman's Kinsey fraud findings in a floor debate, which helped sway cancellation of a proposed $18 million dollar teen-sex survey (TIME, August 5, 1991: 27), viewed by the national sex-education monopoly as a major defeat in their efforts to modify American youth.

VIRGINIA, 1986: Dr. Peter Anderson wrote:"The City Council voted 7-0 in favor of banning topless dancing … due to Dr. Reisman's knowledge of the material and her ability to present it in such a clear and concise manner.I encourage anyone to have Dr. Reisman address either their citizens or community leaders if they need help in fighting pornography in the local community". (June 1986).

MICHIGAN, circa 1980: Testimony to the Michigan State Senate Juvenile Justice Corrections, to aid decision-making on pornography harms.

MISCELLANEOUS USA

ILLINOIS, 1994: As an expert on "Cultural Diversity," Dr. Reisman's presentation of evidence, citing to the use of Kinsey's findings in the planned curriculum, successfully aided parents in eliminating a $600,000 mandated Diversity program in Springfield, Illinois schools.

MISCELLANEOUS

MISSOURI, 1988: Missouri Department of Corrections. A Corrections psychologist writes that a group formed to study eliminating Playboy, Penthouse, and Hustler, and all other pornography from the prison system. A call to Missouri corrections finds all pornography but Playboy banned. "Two males within the administrative structure, who reportedly saw no problem with pornography within our system, were greatly swayed in favor of its removal once they read your report…[One] often attempted to sway policy toward allowing pornography to pacify inmates. He now is a member of our committee to halt and ban incoming pornography. Yours was the only report he read." (10/26/88)

COVER STORY IN The National Review, MAY 19, 1997 "Mortal Sins": "The sexual revolution was based on a lie. Judith Reisman has spent thirty years uncovering the truth," by Tom Bethell [and] featured in the Reader's Digest, (4/97), "Sex, Lies and the Kinsey Report."

Comments on Dr. Reisman and her Work

Bruce A. Taylor, President & Chief Counsel, National Law Center for Children and Families: "We should probably call her Detective Reisman for finding the hidden clue to Kinsey's crimes against children and families. She alone noticed that babies were molested in the name of Kinsey's macabre science and her book is the victims' grand jury indictment of perhaps the most destructive sexual revolutionary since Caligula. Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences is a blueprint for justice for victims of sexual exploitation and abuse. In the face of Kinsey's handbook for perpetrators, Dr. Reisman is the victims' amicus curiae." (4/2000)

Tim Tate, Producer-Director, "Kinsey's Paedophiles," Yorkshire TV, Great Britain: "When I first came across Judith Reisman's work my view of Alfred Kinsey was unquestioningly benign... In the course of producing my documentary - 'Kinsey's Paedophiles' - it became clear that every substantive allegation Reisman made was not only true but thoroughly sourced with documentary evidence - despite the Kinsey Institute's reluctance to open its files. My film built on the foundations laid by Dr. Reisman. Those foundations - and the additional evidence we uncovered about Kinsey's involvement with paedophiles who were actively abusing children - make it imperative that his successors at the Kinsey Institute today allow a rigorous and independent investigation of this dark corner of human study." (4/2000)

Robert Sweet, former U.S. Depart. of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Administrator: "Dr. Reisman is a scientist of outstanding exactitude and courage...the massive, affluent sex industry [has been unable] to show her findings to be incorrect or methodologically flawed--in even the smallest detail" (8/25/94).

Bill Moyers, CBS News: "Dear Professor Reisman: Having read your article in the Washington Post, I wanted to say that I, for one, believe your research project to be quite important. Our society faces no more important dilemma, in fact, and I say this as a father, journalist and citizen. In my role as a journalist, however, I would like to.... explore how your conclusions can be reported on the air in a responsible way" (June 19, 1985).

Hon. Dr. Marlene Goldsmith, M.L.C. Legislative Council, Australia: "Thank you for your powerful presentation on Tuesday. There were at least seven Members of Parliament present, and I have had very favorable responses from most of them.... For those of us fighting this battle in the trenches, your visit has been an inspiration. Thank you for all you are doing to make the world a safer place for its children" (Nov. 16, 1992).

The Hon. Dennis Stevenson MLA, Australia: "[Thanks].... in Canberra during your recent Australian tour.... for the in-depth briefing that you gave Parliamentarians.... [and] your presentation to the National Press Club Luncheon.... Parliamentarians.... were surprised to learn that Kinsey's findings have misled many legislators.... [as so much about] human sexuality in the western world derives from Kinsey" (December 11, 1992)

John Rabun, Deputy Director, Nat. Center for Missing & Exploited Children: Reisman's "study must be read by all those concerned with the ways pornography and violence in the media affect the incidence of child sexual exploitation and abuse" (3/24/88).

Dr. Laura Schlessinger: "Dr. Reisman has produced a scholarly and devastating study revealing the ugly and frighteningly dangerous pseudo-scientific assault on our children's innocence." (2003)

Susan Trento, Investigative Reporter, Author of The Power House: exposed Playboy's buying of legislative influence in Washington D.C. to discredit Reisman, whose cataloging of "children, crime and violence in pictures and cartoons found in Playboy, Penthouse, and Hustler...made the publishers of these and other magazines very nervous" (1992:194).

The LA Times, Reisman, "delivers a potentially damaging blow...comparing] two [Mapplethorpe] photographs...to child pornography and [saying] none are fit to hang in an art museum." (10/5/90) In 1991, Playboy, (whispering counsel to the Mapplethorpe defense) reported: "I would have taken a .357 Magnum, walked up to her and said, 'Judith, you're history'" (2/91). Hugh Hefner pens a "letter to the editor" in Canada, 1996, to condemn Reisman's work. Playboy: "Reisman...is lying with statistics...Playboy never has, never will" sexualize children. (12/85). She "puts men's magazines on the endangered species list," (10/88)...is "propagating a new witch-hunt mentality." (2/89).

Tim Philpot, Lawyer/Kentucky Congressman,: "We retained the services of Judith Reisman as an expert witness on the issue of the health, welfare and safety of the four minor children.... Dr. Reisman's testimony was extremely helpful.... on the behavioral issues relating to the potential abuse of the children by either the father or his friends" (9/5/96).

Pamela Hobbs: "My father, Dr. A. H. Hobbs.... believed your research was excellent." (9/25/94). University of Pennsylvania sociologist and philosopher, Dr. Albert Hobbs, provided the scholarship that led the Rockefeller Foundation to abandon Kinsey's grant funds, instead funding the American Law Institute to implement Kinsey's fraudulent sex data into The Model Penal Code in order to eliminate or reduce most sex crime penalties.

Law Enforcement Training Conference on Child Sexual Exploitation and Obscenity, Memphis, Tennessee, on Dr. Reisman as Guest speaker particularly enjoyed the views of Dr. Judith Reisman and wished she had been able to spend more time with us. Her comments were right on target ... This seminar changed my total outlook/viewpoint on these type cases. Dr. Reisman could start a revolution. She's great ... I would have liked to have heard her speak more. She turned some lights on in my mind (10/4-5, 1993).

Jerre Thompson, President of Southland 7-11 Corp., Letter to the Attorney General's Commission on Pornography: [It] became apparent to us--especially from the generally unrebutted testimony before your Commission-- that respected experts who have studied this issue very carefully are of the opinion that apparently a very small segment of our society employs various tools, including adult magazines, to assist in abuses of children and others. This was strongly pointed out in Judith Reisman's report before the Commission at its [Miami, Florida] hearing on child pornography (4/ 10/86).

Sam Houston State University Criminal Justice Center, Texas, Announced: "Local Professional Named to Missing Children-Serial Murderer Task Force: Judith A. Reisman, Professor at American University in Washington, D.C., has been named to a National task force (funded by two agencies of the U.S. Department of Justice), given the job of developing the master plan for a nationwide system to trace missing or abducted children and adults, serial murderers and conduct research.... the other (session is) at the FBI Academy, Quantico,," (8/15, 1983).

Brief Vitae of Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D.

AUTHOR: BOOK PUBLICATIONS

Images of Children, Crime and Violence in Playboy, Penthouse, and Hustler, US Dep. Justice Grant No. 84-JN-AX-K007, 1986, 1989, 1990.

Kinsey, Sex and Fraud, Judith Reisman et al., Lafayette LA: Huntington House, 1990.

Soft Porn Plays Hardball, Lafayette: LA. Huntington House, 1991.

Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences, The Institute for Media Education, Crestwood, KY., 1998, 2000, 2003.

EDUCATION

Ph.D. 1980 in Communications, Case Western Reserve University
M.A. 1976 in Communications, Case Western Reserve University

PARTIAL LIST OF INCLUSIONS/CITATIONS TO RESEARCH AND FINDINGS IN SCHOLARLY AND POPULAR BOOKS

Savage, M., (2005) Liberalism is a Mental Disorder, Nashville, Tennessee, Nelson Current. Savage's criticism of Kinsey's use of fraudulent data and sex crimes against children to launch the sexual revolution
Kupelian, D., (2005) The Marketing of EVIL, Nashville, Tennessee, WND Books, The citation of Reisman's findings of Kinsey's fraudulent data and sex crimes against children launched a bizarre and aborted faculty attack on Ohio State University Reference librarian, Scott Savage, April-May 2006--as of this writting Mr. Savage is contemplating defamation litigation.
Brinkman, S., (2004) The Kinsey Corruption: An Expose, Catholic Standard and Times, Ascension Press, West Chester PA (book based on Reisman's findings)
Wagner, T., (2003) Back to the Drawing Board, "The Kinsey Culture: Sex on Demand, Abortion on Demand," South Bend, St. Augustine's Press (chapter)
Kastleman, M. (2001) Internet Pornography: The Drug of the New Millennium, Orem, UT, Granite Pub. (Foreword, citation)
Jones. E. Michael (2000) Libido Dominadi: Sexual Liberation and Political Control, South Bend IN: St. Augustine's Press (citation)
Ericksen, J. and Steffen, S. Kiss and Tell: Surveying Sex in the Twentieth Century, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1999 (citation).
Jones. E. Michael (1993) Degenerate Moderns: Modernity as Rationalized Sexual Misbehavior, San Francisco, CA, Ignatius (citation)
Chalfant, J. (1999) Abandonment Theology: The Clergy and the Decline of American Christianity, Winter Park, FL (citation)
Mack, D. (1997) The Assault on Parenthood Simon and Schuster, (citation)
Brennen, W. (1995) Dehumanizing the Vulnerable, Loyola University Press (citation)
Zillmann, D. (1994) Media, Children and The Family. NJ: Erlbaum (JAR article)
Ruggiero, V.R. (1994) Warning, Nonsense is Destroying America, Nashville: Nelson (citation)
Wolinsky, M. (1993) Gays and the Military, Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ: Judge Gasch's ruling and the Lancet cite to Dr. Reisman on Kinsey's fraud.
Hattermer, B. (1993) Don't Touch That Dial. Lafayette, LA: Huntington House (JAR article)
Trento, S. (1992) The Power House. NYC: The New Press (citation)
Kincaid, C. (1992) The Playboy Foundation. Washington DC: Capital Research Center (citation)
Bolton, R. (1992) Cultural Wars. NYC: The New Press (JAR article)
Osaka, F. (1989) Source Book of Pornography. MA: Lexington (citation)
Zimbardo, P. (1988) Psychology and Life. MA: Scott, Foreman (citation)
Mawyer, M. (1987) Silent Shame. Westchester, IL: Crossways (citation)
Burgess, A. (1986) Sexual Exploitation of Patients. NYC: Garland (JAR article)
McCuen, E. (1985) Pornography and Sexual Violence. WI: Gem (JAR article)
Lederer, Laura (1981) Take Back the Night. NYC: Bantam (JAR article/interview)
Skirball Museum (1974) A Walk Through the Past. CA: Hebrew Union College (JAR epic poem)

GUEST LECTURER

Princeton University
Georgetown University
American University
University of Jerusalem
University of Haifa
Rutherford Institute
Texas Woman's University
Clarkson College
Notre Dame University
University of Kentucky
Pepperdine University
Council for National Policy
Human Life International
Johns Hopkins University Medical School
Tel Aviv University
Accuracy in Academic
Accuracy in Media
Concerned Women for America
Rutherford Institute
The Abstinence Clearinghouse
American Society of Criminology
North Carolina Psychiatric Association
Israeli Army Air Force Academy, Israel
International Assoc. of Police Women
Criminal Division/Executive US Attorney
NOVA, NCASA, CCAVE, NCTV, NET...
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Vice and Police Organizations
Child Protection Organizations
United States Air Force Academy, Colorado
etc.

ACADEMIC POSITIONS

Adjunct faculty, George mason University, 1990
Research Full Professor, The American University, 1983-85
Asst./Assoc. Prof., (Martze) University of Haifa, Israel, 1981-83

EXPERT WITNESS: COURT, MILITARY, CIVIC HEARINGS

---- Needs updating -------

Expert Witness: Senate Hearing on "The Science Behind Pornography Addiction" Science, Technology and Space Committee, November 18, 2004
Invited Paper: HR 3300: The Military Honor & Decency Act (Pornography Law) May 1996
Invited Paper: South Africa Film and Publications Bill of 1995 (Pornography Law) 1995
Briefed: Selected Lansing Michigan Legislators (Pornography Law) May 1994
Briefed: Kirkland & Ellis (Re: Oral Argument, United States v. Knox) April 1994
Briefed: Australian Parliament Standing Committee on Social Issues (Media Effects) 1992, 1994
Invited Paper: Ontario Human rights Commission (Pornography Effects) 1993
Invited Paper: Senate Committee on Armed Services (Homosexuality) July 1993
Briefed: Army Chief of Staff Gordon Sullivan, Senator Malcolm Wallop (Homosexuality in the Military) December 1993 Invited Paper,
Testimony: Presidential Commission on the Assignment of Women in the Armed Forces 1992
Briefed: Inspector General Roland Griffith (Homosexuality) December 1993
Expert Research Younger et al., v. Stroh (Federal Court Sex Harassment) 1992
Testified: Australian Parliament, Senate Select Committee (X & R Rated Effects) April 1992
Invited Paper: Office of US Surgeon General (Mass Media Harms) March 1992
Testified: State of Georgia Senate Ed Committee (Kinsey-Sex Ed Curriculum) February 1992
Testified: Hamilton County Prosecutor's Office: OH (Mapplethorpe Trial) August & October 1990
Testified: City Council; Newport News, VA (Nude Dancing & Public Order) June 1986
Invited Paper: US Attorney General Commission on Pornography: NYC (Effects) January 1986
Testified: US Attorney General Commission on Pornography; Miami (Effects) November 1985
Invited Paper: US Attorney general Task Force, Domestic Violence: DC (Effects) August 1985
Testified: Michigan State Senate Juvenile Justice, Corrections: MI (Effects) October 1980

SELECTED GRANTS/POSITIONS

Bureau of Justice Assistance, US Department of Justice: Grant Reviewer, "Reducing Community Gun Violence" 2002
Bureau of Justice Assistance, US Department of Justice: Grant Reviewer, Evaluation of Child Protection Proposals, 1991
HHS: Administrator for Children, Youth, and Families: Grant Reviewer 1991
Eastern Division Vice Investigators Association: Inservice Trainer 1987-89
HHS Dept. of Substance Abuse Prevention: Research Paper 1989
Skaggs Foundation: Visual Literacy Training Grant 1987-89
Department of Education: "Drug Free Schools" Grant Reviewer 1987
Department of Education: "Drug Free Videos" Grant Reviewer 1985
Georgetown Pediatrics Department: Inservice Training Seminars Grand Rounds 1984
FBI Academy: Erotica/Pornography Effects: Inservice Training Seminar/Video 1983
OJJDP Missing Children - Serial Murder Task Force: Inservice Trainer 1983-85
DoJ Office of Juvenile Justice: Principal Investigator, Pornography, Media Research 1983-94
Israel Science Ministry Department of Sex Education: Kinsey and Inservice trainer, Media 1980-83
Scholastics Magazine, NYC: Art & Education Writer, Producer 1970-80
Milwaukee Public Museum: Art/Anthropology Television Writer, Producer 1970s
Cleveland Museum of Art: Art/Head Start, Education Videos/Captain Kangaroo 1970s
Los Angeles Skirball Museum: History/Archeology Educational Videos 1966-81
Captain Kangaroo CBSTV: Segment Producer, Performance Artist 1976-1982

PAST/PRESENT ADVISORY BOARD MEMBER

Science Advisor; California Protective Parents Association

Science Advisor; Education Task Force, SubCommittee on Science Fraud in the Classroom, for The American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC)

Founder, Institute of Media Education and the Family, Israel

Bereaved Parents Association (Juvenile autoerotic deaths), AZ

Paul & Lisa, Inc. (Child prostitute rescue organization), CT

Accuracy in Academia, Washington, D.C.

SELECTED JOURNAL ARTICLES

Regent University Law Review 2002
International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, (Netherlands) 1992 (cite)
The Journal of Human Sexuality (Lewis & Stanley) 1996
Law & Justice: The Christian Law Review (UK) 1995
Collected Papers from the National Association for Research & Therapy of Homosexuality Conference (NARTH) July 1995
Ethnology and Sociobiology (USA) 1984
New Universities Quarterly: Culture, Education, and Society (UK) 1981
Journal of Educational Thought and Practice in Collective Settlements (Israel) 1983
New York University Review of Law and Social Change (USA) 1978-79
Women Speaking (UK) July-September 1978
"A Walk Through the Past," Los Angeles Skirball Museum, (Hebrew Union College) 1974

PAST/PRESENT SELECTEDMEMBERSHIPS

Women in Neuroscience
The American Statistical Association
The Society for the Advancement of Sexual Health
Western Society of Criminology
National Association of Scholars
National Council on Family Relations
American Public Health Association
The New York Academy of Sciences
The International Communication Associations
The National Black Child Development Institute Research
Council on Ethnopsychology
The Society for the Scientific Study of Sex
American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers
The World Association of Infant Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines
American Association for the Advancement of Science
National Association for Research & Therapy of Homosexuality (Fellow)

MEDIA/PRESS CITATIONS AND APPEARANCES

Ted Baehr Movieguide
The American Spectator
The Weekly Standard
Fidelity - The Australian
The London Times
TIME
New Dimensions
The Los Angeles Times
Reader's Digest, April 1997
The Lancet (British Medical Journal)
International German Medical tribune - Science
The Scientist
Archives of Sexual Behavior
The (British Physicians) Quarterly
Newsweek
700 Club, CBN NBC, ABC, CBS, PBS,
The Washington Post
The National Review, May 19, 1997 "Cover Story"
German Arts Television
Dutch Television - Faith Daniels (NBC)
Entertainment Tonight
O'Reilly - Jenny Jones
BBC, Great Britain
The Washington Times
Larry King Live
Donahue
The Today Show
People are Talking
Sally Jesse Raphael
Crier & Crier
Crossfire, CNN
The Princeton Peninsula
The New York Times
D. James Kennedy

SELECTED MEDIA CO-AWARDS

Learning Magazine, Best Filmstrip of Year, w/ Scholastics 1981-82

US Industrial Film Festival Gold Camera w/ Scholastics 1982

Dukane Award Outstanding Creative Sound Films w/ Scholastics 1982

US Industrial Film Festival Silver Camera w/ Scholastics 1982

ACT Award Children Music w/CBSTV Captain Kangaroo 1976-79

1st Place Local PSA/TV series w/ Jewish Family Service Assoc. 1974

SELECTED PAST/PRESENT HONORS

"Guardian of the Light Award" The Lighted Candle Society, 2006

"Research Award" The Abstinece Clearinghouse, 2005

"Protector of Children" Citizens for Families, 2005

"Save Our Children Scientist Of The Year For 1993," The Save Our Children National Alliance

Who's Who in Science and Engineering
The World Who's Who of Women
Who's Who of American Women
International Who's Who in Education
International Who's Who in Sexology
Two Thousand Notable Americans
International Book of Honor

Contact / Donations

To schedule Dr. Reisman for speaking, consulting, or to order books:

Email:
Website: www.drjudithreisman.org

Donation

Dr. Reisman's "institutional" funding comes only from The American people. To become a supporter, send your tax-deductible donation to:

Dr. Judith Reisman
c/o the California Protective Parents Association
PO Box 15284
Sacramento, CA 95851-0284.

Or:

Thank You!